wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Exclusive: Committee for regulating edtech companies will have retired judge, IAS officer as members

India’s growing edtech industry has also agreed to a common set of rules, after coming under fire for alleged malpractices.

You are reading it here first: A retired judge and a bureaucrat, specifically an IAS officer, will make up an external body as the second tier in a grievance redressal mechanism that edtech companies have established for regulating themselves.

Sources said that the edtech platforms will be “controlled” by this Internal Grievance Regulatory Body (IGRB). In the coming days, the committee will sit for a meeting and in that meeting, the exact composition of the body will be decided. Apart from the proposed IGRB, the two-tier grievance redressal mechanism will also comprise the India EdTech Consortium (IEC) whose members include —

  • Byju’s
  • Careers 360
  • Classplus
  • Doubtnut
  • Great Learning
  • Harappa
  • Times Edutech and Events Ltd
  • Scaler
  • Simplilearn
  • Toppr
  • Unacademy
  • upGrad
  • UNext Learning
  • Vedantu
  • WhiteHat Jr

The IEC has been formed under the aegis of the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI)

These developments come a few weeks after Congress MP Karti Chidambaram brought up the malpractices surrounding edtech companies in Parliament and asked for the government to regulate these companies. The education ministry also issued an advisory flagging dangerous practices by edtech companies.

Edtech companies have also come up with Code of Conduct

Apart from the two-tier grievance redressal mechanism, edtech companies have also decided that they will follow a Code of Conduct. Although MediaNama was not able to establish what specific guidelines will be included in the Code of Conduct, sources said that it will address issues such as —

  • Aggressive marketing practices
  • Financial services which are provided as part of edtech services
  • Communication to users and marketing
  • Misleading advertisements

Government advises citizens on how to deal with edtech platforms

In an advisory issued on December 23, the Ministry of Education recommended that citizens do background checks of ed-tech companies before purchasing from them. The ministry also warned users against enabling auto-debit payment mechanisms on such platforms and asked them to check the quality of the educational material, among other suggestions.

Avoid getting coerced into loans, falling for OTP scams:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  • Users should not sign up for loans of which they are not aware.
  • Children should be made to understand marketing strategies used by ed-tech companies to encourage spending.
  • The automatic debit option for payment should be avoided as it could lead to a child inadvertently accessing paid content. Credit/debit cards should also not be added for subscription on apps, and these cards should have an upper expenditure limit. Purchases on such apps should not be allowed without parental consent.
  • Sharing information about bank account, OTP, card, email, etc. should be avoided since it could be sold or used for scam attacks.
  • A tax invoice statement should be demanded on the purchase of educational devices loaded with contents/app purchase/Pendrive learning.

Also Read:

Have something to add? Post your comment and gift someone a MediaNama subscription.

Written By

Among other subjects, I cover the increasing usage of emerging technologies, especially for surveillance in India

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ