wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

I&B Ministry, Intelligence Bureau told govt that IT Act does not allow regulation of online content: Report

The government’s own legal advisers had also raised concerns about the new IT rules but they were overruled, reports said in May.

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B) and the Intelligence Bureau (IB) had both submitted in official documents that no existing law in India empowered the government to regulate online content and a new law must be legislated for this purpose, The Morning Context reported based on documents obtained under the Right to Information Act.

Despite this objection, the government on February 25 went ahead and notified the Information Technology (IT) Rules 2021, which governs social media platforms, digital news publishers, and online streaming platforms. The government has repeatedly stated that the rules were issued under the existing powers granted by the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, the I&B Ministry prepared a draft cabinet note in July 2020 stating that the IT Act is not meant to regulate content on electronic devices and a new law is needed for this purpose. The Intelligence Bureau also found the IT Act to be inadequate to regulate online streaming and video platforms and wanted a “statute-backed regulatory framework” to address this issue, the report revealed.

Currently, the new rules are being challenged in multiple courts across the country, with petitioners arguing the same. “The observations made by two important arms of the central government appear to confirm the validity of the criticism about the new IT Rules,” the report stated.

Office of Prime Minister involved

The documents obtained by The Morning Context also reveal that the officials in the Prime Minister’s Office and Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself were involved in amending the Allocation of Business Rules and the IT Rules to empower the government to regulate online content. The Allocation of Business Rules was amended in November 2020 to bring digital news publishers and online streaming platforms under the I&B ministry. Subsequently, the provisions of the IT Rules concerning these platforms fell under the purview of the I&B ministry, rather than the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“The PMO and the IT ministry appear to have been keen to regulate online content by amending the rules quickly, instead of taking the longer, but more consultative, route of a Parliament-backed law,” the report stated.

Govt legal advisors also advised the same

Two of the government’s own legal advisers warned it that the new IT Rules were beyond the scope of the law and required parliamentary approval, but Law Secretary Anoop Mendiratta overruled this advice for “the larger public interest,” Article 14 reported in May.

This advice was given in January and February last year and pertains to a draft version of the rules that did not include provisions for streaming platforms and digital news publishers. Based on the documents obtained by Article 14, the law ministry advisers did not seem to comment on the inclusion of OTT platforms and digital media in the IT rules, but noted that there was “no specific provision in the IT Act enabling (sic) to impose any penalty or to take penal action against the intermediaries or digital media.”

A deputy legal adviser from the Ministry of Law and Justice warned the MeitY in January last year to first make “suitable amendments” to the IT Act, 2000 before promulgating the new IT Rules. Later in February 2020, a law ministry joint secretary and legal adviser wrote a three-page note expanding on the advice given by the deputy legal adviser. The joint secretary noted that the new rules “give a wide amplitude to the duties and functions of intermediary” and “seems to extend beyond the scope of third party information, data or communication link made available or hosted by him.” The joint secretary also reminded the government that the executive has no power to turn “a particular act into an offence and prescribe punishment for it” and the rules “suffered from “the vice of excessive delegation.”

Also Read

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ