wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Daily Digest of Tech Policy News and Updates (April 26, 2021)

Bringing you quick updates on the tech space, policy making and digital rights from India and across the globe.

Government censorship of COVID-19 social media posts

Last week, we reported that the Indian government requested Twitter to block 52 tweets that mostly criticised the government’s handling of the second surge of the COVID-19 pandemic. The tweets belonged to Revanth Reddy, a sitting Member of Parliament; Moloy Ghatak, a West Bengal state minister; actor Vineet Kumar Singh; and two filmmakers, Vinod Kapri and Avinash Das.

Now, according to other news reports, the government has asked Twitter to block around 100 tweets. This was done to “prevent obstructions” to the fight against the pandemic and to avoud crimes against public order. The IT Ministry had issued these blocking orders on reccomendation from the Home Ministry.

The government seems to be justifying the blocking orders by saying the tweets were spreading “fake news”, and they were necessary for maintaining public order. But most of the 52 tweets were only criticism of the institutional failure to prevent a second wave of the virus, let alone putting in place systems to assist patients and their families. Very few had any misinformation. However, unfortunately, the government’s blocking powers over internet intermediaries and social media companies cannot be challenged in courts. Companies have to first comply with the government’s order and only then can they approach the courts. Similarly, users whose tweets are blocked can only challenge the governments’ decision to block their social media post under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution by approaching the courts.

Recently, the government notified new Information Technology Rules 2021 for online intermediaries giving it more powers to regulate social media companies. While the rules have created a new framework for self-regulation by social media companies, it also has placed a significant legal and compliance burden on executives working for social media giants in India. Further, the new self-regulatory regime and grievance redressal mechanism, instituted by the government under these rules, does not award users with powers to challenge a government or platform specific decision that affects their rights.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

It is important to note that Twitter has only blocked Indian users from accessing the tweet. Users abroad can continue to see the blocked tweets. This is because Twitter only removes tweets that are in violation of its rules, whereas tweets that are illegal in a particular jurisdiction, but not in violation of the Twitter rule, remain accessible beyond that jurisdiction.


Top Stories From MediaNama

ICYMI: NAMA Event on IT Rules 2021

On April 23, we hosted a discussion on how the IT Rules 2021 will impact Intermediaries. You can watch the discussion here:

RBI to issue cyber-security guidelines for payment companies

The Reserve Bank of India will issue a specific set of cyber-security guidelines for payment service providers. The decision to issue a fresh set of cyber norms for payment companies comes in the wake of significant data breaches at MobiKwik and Juspay, among others.

T Rabi Shankar, executive director, RBI said that firms will need to go beyond the minimum standards to ensure their systems and data is safe and secure. “Having said that, the minimum standards set by the regulator for the regulated entities are needed, but they would never be enough. As digitisation increases in any sphere, payments or otherwise, as people do more and more digital transactions, institutions themselves will have to do more than the minimum standards that regulators set, to deal with any cybersecurity threats,” he said.

Read: RBI to issue cybersecurity norms for payment services [The Hindu]

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Delhi HC Dismisses PhonePe’s injunction request

The Delhi High Court, in an order dated April 15, dismissed an interim injunction request by PhonePe against BharatPe over the use of the ‘Pe’ suffix. In its plea, PhonePe alleged that the suffix used by BharatPe infringes on the formers’ trademark. PhonePe has been pursuing the injunction request against BharatPe over the use of ‘Pe’ since 2019.

“Barring the common ‘Pe’ suffix, it cannot be said that the ‘PhonePe’ trademark of the plaintiff and the ‘BharatPe’ trademark of the defendant are confusingly or deceptively similar. As words, they are entirely different, except for the ‘Pe’ suffix. ‘Phone’ and ‘Bharat’ are not even phonetically similar,” the order said.

PhonePe had sought While the HC has dismissed the interim injunction plea, PhonePe will “continue to pursue this trial to defend its popular and dominant brand positioning and take necessary steps to prevent any misuse of its mark,” a PhonePe spokesperson told Mint.

Read: Delhi High-Court Judgement April 15, 2021

Who owns ‘Pe’? HC Dismisses PhonePe’s exclusivity on suffix [Mint]

Tencent backs Indian platform ShareChat despite restrictions

Chinese tech giant Tencent invested $225 million into ShareChat through two European entities, despite the Indian government’s rules restricting Chinese investments in local companies. ShareChat recently launched a video-content app called Moj, in the wake of the government’s ban on TikTok and other Chinese origin apps. Moj has over 120 million users while the flagship ShareChat app has over 106 million users.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

ShareChat has raised a total of $501 million from investors like Tiger Global and Snap in a recent funding round, of which $225 million was provided by Tencent in the form of convertible debt. The investment came from two Amsterdam-based companies called Zennis Capital and Holidyn BV, both of which were registered in February. Both entities have common directors, including Tencent’s head of finance for Europe and its senior counsel in Europe. Together, the Dutch entities would own 19.74% in ShareChat if the debt is converted.

Read: Tencent quietly backed Indian platform ShareChat despite restrictions [Financial Times]

Written By

Reports on banking, payments, fintech and crypto-curencies. Additional reporting on media regulations, data protection and other areas.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ