wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

OTT streaming regulations don’t have “teeth”: Supreme Court to govt

Supreme Court
Credit: Aditi Agrawal

The Supreme Court has reviewed the government’s rules for OTT streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video, and observed that they are not tough enough, Live Law reported. “We have received the Rules you have filed. These Rules don’t have any teeth. There’s no provision for prosecution. They’re only just guidelines,” the court observed, according to remarks carried on Twitter by Live Law.

Tushar Mehta, the Solicitor General of India, reportedly said the government “can come up with a draft within two weeks” for “the Court’s consideration”.

The OTT guidelines were “welcomed” by the industry on Thursday. With Mehta’s comments, it’s unclear if the government intends to issue new guidelines, add to the 2021 guidelines, or whether it’s simply stating that it is capable of bringing in new guidelines. If the Supreme Court gets its way, the IT Rules could have provisions for prosecuting streaming services who make content that violates the law.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The case in question is actually unrelated; Aparna Purohit, who heads Indian Originals at Amazon Prime Video, was appealing against a refusal by the Allahabad High Court to grant her protection from arrest. Amazon, which apologized for two scenes in the show that led to right wing groups to file FIRs all over the country, reportedly said through its advocate Mukul Rohatgi (the previous Attorney General of India) that the scenes have been deleted, and if “two more scenes need to be removed, we will do it.” The court reportedly granted Purohit protection from arrest, as long as she cooperated with investigations. 

In response to the bench’s observation that some OTT providers were showing pornography, Rohatgi said that “You can watch hundreds of movies [on Prime Video], you will not find anything pornographic. I myself watch a movie every evening.”

Also read

Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ