wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Delhi High Court upholds Amazon’s arbitration order in Future Retail case

The Delhi High Court on Thursday upheld the Emergency Arbitration order against Future Group putting on hold the retail giant’s acquisition by Reliance Retail, Bar & Bench reported. The court upheld that the purchase violated an agreement that was signed between Amazon and Future Coupons, an investor company in Future Retail Limited. The court observed that the Future Group had agreed to give Amazon a veto on transactions like the Reliance Retail acquisition, but failed to hold good to that commitment. The judgement is a win for Amazon, but the matter is likely to be decided only in the Supreme Court, where a hearing for the case is already due, but that appeal is from Amazon.

This has been one of Amazon’s biggest legal challenges in India. The company invested over Rs 1,000 crores in Future Coupons under the condition that the retail giant wouldn’t be sold off without its consent. The Future Group did so anyway, and argued in court, variously, that Amazon had no standing to enforce the Singapore emergency arbitrator’s ruling (for a supposed lack of jurisdiction), and that the agreement signed with Future Coupons didn’t extend to Future Retail. The Delhi High Court rejected this argument, saying that the Singapore arbitrator was right to consider the Future Group’s related companies when deciding the case.

The high court also ruled that Future Retail must deposit Rs 20 lakh into the PM-CARES fund, and that company executives must respond on why they shouldn’t be jailed.

Read the Order (via Delhi High Court website)

Also read

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ