wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CAIT calls for a regulatory body to govern e-commerce companies

The government should set up a regulatory authority to monitor and regulate e-commerce businesses in the country, and it should be empowered with due rights to penalise these companies in case they violate India’s laws, the traders’ body Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) said. In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the trade union also called for the government to issue a fresh Press Note, “blocking” e-commerce companies from violating India’s FDI rules. Press Notes are filed by the Commerce Ministry’s Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade to regulate Foreign Direct Investment rules.

“The e-commerce landscape of the Country has been greatly vitiated by some of the major e-commerce companies who are continuously and openly violating the FDI policy, law and Rules without any fear of law by indulging into predatory pricing, deep discounting, loss funding, controlling inventory, sale of branded products exclusively on their respective portals,” CAIT said in the letter.

India’s FDI policy for e-commerce, the latest version of which is Press Note 2 (2018), allows 100% FDI in B2B e-commerce, i.e. the marketplace model. However, e-commerce companies operating marketplaces have to meet certain conditions. Among other things, they cannot exercise ownership over any inventory sold on their marketplace, or influence the sale of goods directly or indirectly.

CAIT’s letter comes after a damning Reuters report, which showed that a handful of sellers, such as Cloudtail and Appario, accounted for more than 60% of Amazon’s sales in India. The report revealed how Amazon used legal manoeuvres to sidestep Indian regulations aimed at curbing deep discounting and limiting FDI. Following the report, CAIT had written to Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, calling for an investigation into Narayana Murthy, whose Catamaran Ventures owns a majority stake in Cloudtail.

Goyal had, earlier in February, said that e-commerce companies like Amazon and Flipkart are currently “under investigation” following complaints from consumers and small retailers. E-commerce companies are only “service providers”, and they should only enable trade between a buyer and seller, and not promote their own products or use algorithms to give preferential treatment to certain sellers, he had said.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

CAIT on the offensive against Amazon, Flipkart

The CAIT is among the most vocal critics of e-commerce companies, especially Amazon and Flipkart. At least since 2016, CAIT has opposed e-commerce entities for alleged FDI violations. Following its repeated complaints against the two, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), in January, had forwarded their complaints to the Enforcement Directorate and the Reserve Bank of India for “necessary action”. In particular, the DPIIT had forwarded the following complaints made by the CAIT:

  • Aditya Birla Fashion Retail’s sale of a 7.8% stake to the Flipkart Group for 1,500 crore, which CAIT had earlier urged the government to stall, citing violations of India’s FDI regulations.
  • Alleged violation of FDI Policy related to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in manufacturing, which CAIT had claimed was being used for multi brand retailing by various e-commerce companies
  • Complaints against Amazon and Flipkart for allegedly violating the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.

In 2016, it complained to the erstwhile Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion about alleged FDI violations by Flipkart. Since then, it has opposed Walmart’s acquisition of Flipkart, Amazon’s takeover of Aditya Birla Retail’s More supermarket chain, and generally demanded stricter e-commerce regulations, including the need for a dedicated e-commerce policy and regulator. It had even initiated legal action at the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in an attempt to block the Walmart–Flipkart deal. Last year, Praveen Khandelwal, CAIT’s general-secretary and its most visible face, had accused e-commerce companies of stalling policies regulating them and complained that the most popular sellers on e-commerce marketplace were offshoots of the marketplaces themselves.

Also read:

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ