wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Google, Facebook should pay publishers for news, says Microsoft

The United States should not oppose a proposed Australian code which requires Facebook and Google to pay news publishers, instead it should “copy it”, Microsoft’s president and chief legal officer, Brad Smith said in a blogpost — putting the company at odds with Google and Facebook.

“As the 21st century began, the internet eroded the news business as dotcoms like Craigslist disrupted advertising revenue, news aggregators lured away readers, and search engines and social media giants devoured both,” Smith said. “But one thing is clear – the internet and social media have not been kind to the free press.” “What is wrong with compensating independent news organizations for the benefits the tech gatekeepers derive from this content?” Smith added. Citing the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, he said that there was a greater need for a strong press.

In July last year, Australia released a draft News Media Bargaining Code, for consultation, which forces platforms like Facebook and Google to pay Australian news companies for their content. The code also requires platforms to give news companies nearly a month’s notice of any changes to its algorithms which may affect referral traffic to news sites, or those affecting rankings of paywalled news, and “substantial changes” to how news is displayed, and even advertising of news.

Unsurprisingly, both Facebook and Google have pushed back against the code. While Facebook said that it would stop Australians from sharing news, Google went as far ahead to say that it would pull the plug from its services in Australia, if the code were to be implemented.

Microsoft said that in the eventuality Google stopped its services in Australia, its Bing search service would remain in Australia and that it is prepared to share revenues with news organisations under the proposed rules. Smith revealed that he and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella spoke to Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison, assuring him that “even if Google wanted to leave Australia, we would stay”.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

However, it is worth noting that the current code applies to Facebook and Google, and not to Bing, and could give the latter an opportunity to grab market share in  in the country.

By the company’s own admission, the Bing search service has less than 5% market share in Australia which is substantially smaller than the 15-20% market share it has in the US. “But, with a realistic prospect of gaining usage share, we are confident we can build the service Australians want and need. And, unlike Google, if we can grow, we are prepared to sign up for the new law’s obligations, including sharing revenue as proposed with news organizations,” Smith said.

“Our endorsement of Australia’s approach has had immediate impact. Within 24 hours, Google was on the phone with the Prime Minister, saying they didn’t really want to leave the country after all,” he said. “And the link on Google’s search page with its threat to leave? It disappeared overnight. Apparently, competition does make a difference.”

Google recently signed a deal with news publishers in France, agreeing to pay them for content appearing as preview snippets in search results. Facebook also said that it will start paying news publishers in several countries, including in India.

It is not the first time that Microsoft has taken aim at rival tech companies over burning regulatory issues. Earlier, the company said that Apple’s App Store fees should be looked into, after a number of app developers started criticising the mandatory 30% tax applied on in-app purchases on Apple.

Also read: 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ