wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Ignoring Amazon, CCI approves Reliance-Future deal

The Competition Commission of India has approved Reliance Retail’s ₹24,713 crore acquisition of the retail, wholesale, logistics, and warehousing businesses of the Future Group — a deal shrouded in controversy so far. 

The Commission has ignored Amazon’s request that it consider a ruling by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre which had temporarily halted the planned sale. Amazon had obtained the emergency arbitration order arguing that a 2019 deal that it signed with Future Coupons, the promoter entity of the Future Retail Ltd., gave it a right to block the transaction. The Future Group had proceeded anyway, arguing that the arbitration order had no legal force in India, and that provisions of Indian law concerning arbitration did not provide for emergency orders from arbitration centres.

Future Retail Ltd. and Amazon are now fighting it out in the Delhi High Court. Future Retail, represented by senior lawyer Harish Salve, has argued that Amazon mischaracterised the suit as an anti-arbitration suit, when Future was simply seeking non-interference, while continuing to question whether the arbitration court’s order has legal force in India. Salve has argued that under Amazon’s shareholding agreement with Future Coupons Ltd., it merely has investor protection rights, and that only Future Coupons would require prior consent and not Future Retail Ltd. 

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Future Group’s lawyers have said that “showing off” the SIAC’s orders to different regulators “as a binding order is unlawful interference” with Future Retail Ltd.’s business. The Delhi High Court today reserved its order in the suit. 

Earlier this month, Amazon accused the Future Group of insider trading in a letter to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), stating that Reliance Retail was improperly informed of an emergency arbitrator’s order staying a deal between the retail conglomerate and Reliance.

Also read: Future Group moves Delhi High Court against Amazon ‘interfering’ in acquisition by Reliance

Written By

I cover health, policy issues such as intermediary liability, data governance, internet shutdowns, and more. Hit me up for tips.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ