wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Future Group moves Delhi High Court against Amazon ‘interfering’ in acquisition by Reliance

The Future Group has gone to court against Amazon after the e-commerce giant challenged Reliance Retail’s acquisition of much of the Kishore Biyani-headed conglomerate. The development came to light in a stock exchange filing by the Future Group on Sunday. “The Company has filed necessary suit in the Hon’ble Delhi High Court on 7th November, 2020 in relation to seeking necessary reliefs against Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC (“Amazon”) from interfering with the Transaction by misusing an Interim Order dated 25th October, 2020 issued by an Emergency Arbitrator, appointed by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC),” the Future Group said in a filing.

In August, Reliance Retail had announced that it would be acquiring the Future Group’s retail businesses, like Big Bazaar, for ₹24,713 crore. Amazon protested the deal, saying it had a right of “first refusal” to veto the deal because of an investment it made in 2019 in Future Coupons, the promoter entity of the Future Group. Amazon then got an order from an arbitration centre in Singapore to stop the deal. The Future Group, which said the only alternative to the Reliance acquisition would be financial ruin, has resolutely resisted the order, and said it will not comply, telling stock exchanges to ignore the order.

The Future Group has argued that since Amazon’s contract — which gave it a right of first refusal — was with FRL’s promoters, and not with FRL itself, it had no legal standing. We have reached out to the Future Group and Amazon for comment.

Also read

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ