wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

In escalation, Amazon accuses Future Group of insider trading: Report

Amazon is reportedly accusing the Future Group of insider trading in a letter to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), saying that Reliance Retail was improperly informed of an emergency arbitrator’s order staying a deal between the retail conglomerate and Reliance. The development was first reported by Reuters. The tussle between Amazon and the Future Group over the retail conglomerate’s planned acquisition by Reliance Retail has blown up of late, with both sides making arguments for hours before the Delhi High Court. In court, Amazon is being represented by Gopal Subramanium and Future is being represented by Harish Salve.

Amazon had obtained an emergency arbitration order blocking the Future Group’s sale of its retail, logistics, warehousing and wholesale businesses to Reliance Retail, arguing that a 2019 deal that it signed with Future Coupons, the promoter entity of the Future Group, gave it a right to block the transaction. Future proceeded anyway, arguing that the arbitration order had no jurisdiction in India, and that provisions of Indian law concerning arbitration did not provide for emergency orders from arbitration centres.

In an earlier letter to SEBI, Amazon reportedly attacked the Future Group’s statements to stock exchanges saying that the deal would proceed in spite of arbitration, saying that making such filings “is against public interest, misleads public shareholders … as well as perpetuates a fraud for the benefit of the Biyanis alone”. “Please do not allow this American giant to kill Future Group, that’s its game — that if I can’t get it, let Reliance not get it too,” Harish Salve reportedly told the Delhi High Court. The deal between Reliance and Future Group is worth ₹24,713 crores.

Also read

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ