wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

, , ,

Trump signs executive order banning US business with TikTok and WeChat 

china, tiktok banned
Credit: Aditi Agrawal

US President Donald Trump, on August 6, signed an executive order banning US transactions with Chinese internet major Bytedance, TikTok’s parent company. A similar order was signed banning US transactions with Tencent, the parent company of WeChat. Both the orders come in effect in 45 days. The executive orders also mention the Indian government banning TikTok, WeChat and 57 other ‘Chinese’ apps over national security concerns.

This action comes less than a week after Microsoft confirmed that it was in talks to buy the TikTok business from ByteDance in four countries: the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It also said that it will complete these discussions no later than September 15. Going by that timeline, Trump’s executive order will kick in just a few days after Microsoft’s estimated deadline for the deal. The Financial Times also reported that aside from the four markers, Microsoft is also looking to takeover TikTok globally.

Arguments made against TikTok and WeChat in the executive orders: The order against TikTok claimed that it “automatically captures vast swaths of information from its users including Internet and other network activity information such as location data and browsing and search histories”. It said that this data collection “threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans’ personal and proprietary information — potentially allowing China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, build dossiers of personal information for blackmail, and conduct corporate espionage”.

Similarly WeChat, “captures the personal and proprietary information of Chinese nationals visiting the United States, thereby allowing the Chinese Communist Party a mechanism for keeping tabs on Chinese citizens who may be enjoying the benefits of a free society for the first time in their lives,” the order against WeChat claimed.

What’s unclear: Following 45 days, Mike Pompeo, Secretary of the State will “identify” the “transactions” that are to be prohibited. While TikTok and WeChat are certain to be affected, it is unclear which other services owned by the two Chinese companies will fall under the purview of the executive order. For instance, the White House confirmed to the LA Times that the ban will not impact video game companies owned by Tencent, such as Riot Games. Tencent also owns 40% of Epic Games. Tencent also has a stake in various other American companies such as Warner Music, and Tesla.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

While the orders don’t specify how the ban will come about, it is possible that it will impact American users of TikTok and WeChat as both Google and Apple, which are US companies will have to take down the apps from their respective play stores. The actual extent of the executive orders remains unclear at the moment, however; will it stop US advertisers from advertising on TikTok?

The US had been hinting a ban for a while: The United States had been hinting a ban against TikTok and WeChat for a while and seemed particularly inspired by the actions taken in India. Earlier this month, White House advisor, Peter Navarro had said to expect“strong action” from Donald Trump on TikTok, WeChat, and other Chinese apps. Before that Pompeo and Trump himself had hinted at a possible ban.

Aside from the government, even corporate America seems skeptical about TikTok’s security. Financial company Wells Fargo, has directed employees to delete TikTok from company-owned devices amid what it said were concerns about security. Even Amazon sent out an email to employees asking them to delete TikTok from devices which they use to access company email, only to later backtrack, and say that the instruction was an error.

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ