wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

, , , , ,

FCC designates Huawei, ZTE as threats to US national security

The Federal Communications Commission of the United States on Tuesday designated Huawei and ZTE as national security threats. The FCC said that telecom operators using the US’s Universal Service Fund for bringing connectivity to rural areas will not be allowed to use public funds to buy equipment from the two companies. This is a part of a long-running campaign by the United States against the Chinese telecom equipment makers.

The US government is trying to get other countries to agree to similar blacklisting efforts, pushing the idea — with some success — that the companies pose surveillance and espionage threats at the pushing of the Chinese government. On June 24, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo name-checked Jio as one of the operators globally “rejecting doing business with tools of the CCP surveillance state, like Huawei”. The US has been fighting against the use of the two companies’ participation in the country’s 5G market. Bipartisan efforts to check the companies’ American presence were ongoing as early as the early 2010s.

This designation comes as a particularly interesting development for India, which finds itself in a geopolitical stalemate with China. Though India approved Huawei and ZTE’s participation in 5G trials, the recent border skirmishes have increased pressure on the government to retaliate. On top of banning TikTok and tens of other Chinese apps, the Times of India reported quoting unnamed sources that government ministers are considering bans on Huawei and ZTE. The Economic Times earlier reported, again quoting unnamed sources, that a BSNL tender would be revoked to prevent Chinese firms from participating. The Universal Service Obligation Fund, India’s equivalent of the US’s Universal Service Fund, in 2019–20 had revenues of around one-eighth of what the US spends every year, and spent less than half of that revenue in that year. It is unclear if USOF spending will be restricted in a similar way.

Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ