wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

TikTok suspends creator Faizal Siddiqui’s account for video allegedly promoting acid attacks

Faizal siddiqui, youtube vs Tiktok, TikTok

Update on May 19: TikTok has suspended Faizal Siddiqui’s account after his video allegedly promoting acid attacks on women went viral on Twitter yesterday. TikTok said the video violated its guidelines, and the platform is working with law agencies “as appropriate”. The National Commission for Women had asked the platform to delete the video, and also suspend Siddiqui’s account. A TikTok spokesperson shared the following statement with MediaNama:

“Keeping people on TikTok safe is a top priority and we make it clear in our Term of Service and Community Guidelines that clearly outlines what is not acceptable on our platform. As per the policy, we do not allow content that risks safety of others, promotes physical harm or glorifies violence against women. The behaviour in question violates our guidelines and we have taken down content, suspended the account, and are working with law enforcement agencies as appropriate.” — TikTok spokesperson (emphasis ours)

At the moment it isn’t clear if this is a permanent suspension, and we’ve asked TikTok about it. We’ve also reached out to Siddiqui via Instagram for comment.

Earlier on May 18: The National Commission for Women has asked Maharashtra’s DGP to take “immediate action” against TikTok creator Faizal Siddiqui after one of his videos, allegedly “promoting acid attack on girls and women for revenge”, went viral on Twitter. The commission has asked TikTok to block Siddiqui’s profile and give it a detailed action-taken report ‘at an early date’. In the viral video, Siddiqui can be seen throwing contents of a glass on a girl with graphic makeup on her face, supposedly to look like an acid attack victim. However, Siddiqui has contested that that the viral video is only a portion of the original video that he had uploaded to TikTok last month (more on that below). MediaNama could not independently verify Siddiqui’s claims since the video has been taken down from TikTok.

“NCW condemns the video of digital content creator promoting a grievous crime of acid attack to the young followers on the social media platform,” the Commission wrote in the letter to Maharashtra DGP, adding that it is “disturbed by the use of cyberspace to instigate crime against women”. Siddiqui is among the most popular Indian creators on TikTok with over 13 million followers.

At the time of publishing, the video was taken down from Siddiqui’s profile, but his account was still active. The Commission’s chairperson Rekha Sharma said that the video was deleted from TikTok after a call from NCW. We have reached out to Tiktok and Maharashtra’s DGP for comment, and have reached out to Siddiqui via Instagram.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“Social media platforms should prevent people from posting such videos in the first place, and people posting such content should be blocked from the platform”, NCW India chairperson Rekha said in a video posted on twitter.

Creator says part of video chopped off

In an Instagram post, Siddiqui contested that in the viral video on Twitter, the beginning part from his original video has been edited out. He said that in the portion that was removed, he can be seen drinking out of the glass, and also shared what he claims is the complete original video, where he can be seen drinking out of the glass before he throws the contents of the glass on the face of the woman. “Who drinks acid,” he asked in his post.

Siddiqui further claimed that the video went live last month, and speculated that the ongoing “rivalry” between TikTok and YouTube could be the reason behind why people were making a “fuss” about the video now.  He also clarified that the woman in the video is a professional makeup artist and her makeup in the video “in no way represents a victim of an acid attack” and is “just her way of projecting her art and profession”.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ