wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

129 signatories urge Facebook against end-to-end encryption citing child safety

Citing child safety online, 129 signatories across 102 countries have written to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, urging him to resist introducing end-to-end encryption across Facebook’s messaging platforms. They argued that implementing end-to-end encryption would result in “more serious and sustained sexual abuse on Facebook’s virtual properties”. The Financial Times first reported this. We have reached out to Facebook for comment.

Who all signed the letter? The letter, dated February 6, 2020, has been signed by 129 signatories including non-profit organisations, think tanks and individuals. The effort was led by UK’s National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children and Barnardo’s. American professor Hany Farid, who specialises in analyzing digital images, and Australian academic Michael Salter are two of the signatories. Two Indian NGOs, Arpan and Tulir, also signed the letter.

Why did they write the letter? In March 2019, Facebook had announced that it would eventually introduce end-to-end encryption to all its messaging services. The signatories are not “satisfied” that their concerns about protecting children online have been sufficiently addressed. They are concerned that the integration of Facebook Messenger and Instagram Direct would allow abusers to exploit the design and make “easy and frictionless contact” with large numbers of children.

What do they want? They want Facebook to take the following measures:

  • Halt the rollout of integration until Facebook proves that there would be “no net reduction” in child safety and proposed mitigations have been fully tested
  • Share data with governments and child protection experts to assess and access the impact of any changes
  • Embed voluntary duty of care to protect children

Has lack of encryption actually helped fight circulation of child sexual abuse material (CSAM)? As per the letter, yes. Facebook made 16.8 million of the 18.4 million reports to the US National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) which led to more than 2,500 arrests in 2018 by British law enforcement agencies. These reports will be reduced by 12 million, or 70%, as per NCMEC estimates.

Private organisations aren’t the only ones against end-to-end encryption:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  • USA, UK and Australia are against end-to-end encryption: In October 2019, US Attorney General William Barr, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin K. McAleenan, British Home Secretary Priti Patel, and Australian Home Minister Peter Dutton had written an open letter to Facebook asking Zuckerberg to not implement E2E encryption, or to build a backdoor to it for law enforcement agencies. They had cited the same NCMEC statistics as this open letter. In response, Facebook had said that it won’t build a backdoor to end-to-end encryption.
  • Rajya Sabha recommends breaking E2E encryption to protect children: This letter comes at the heels of a Rajya Sabha ad hoc committee’s recommendation that law enforcement agencies be allowed to break end-to-end encryption to trace distributors of child pornography.
  • Tamil Nadu government also wants decryption: The Tamil Nadu government told the Supreme Court that it wants a way to decrypt encrypted communications to nab criminals.

Facebook grapples with CSAM: As per a New York Times report on prevalence of child sexual abuse material online, 12 million of the 18.4 million worldwide reports of such material were from Messenger.

***Update (February 7, 2019 12:34 pm): The article was updated with a link to the full letter with more details about the signatories and what they want. The original article was published on February 6 at 12:23 pm.

Written By

Send me tips at aditi@medianama.com. Email for Signal/WhatsApp.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ