wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

WhatsApp traceability case: Details of data requests made by Tamil Nadu govt to social media companies

The Madras High Court released the daily order (available below) for the WhatsApp traceability case on July 5, the last hearing for which took place on June 27. The Deputy Secretary to Government, IT Department of Tamil Nadu filed a report on June 26 with details of data requests it made to social media companies — Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Google and YouTube. The social media companies were supposed to have replied to this report by July 17. The petitioner in the case, Antony Clement Rubin, told MediaNama that Facebook and WhatsApp have submitted their responses. MediaNama is awaiting confirmation on others’ response. The next hearing is on July 24, 2019. Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Arvind Datar are expected to appear for WhatsApp.

Here are the details from the government’s report, as extracted in the daily order. Please note that the court order doesn’t mention the time period during which these requests were made.

* NB: There appears to be an error in the daily order. Under ‘Content Requests’, the ‘Requests Sent’ and ‘Furnished’ columns should be switched. MediaNama is awaiting a confirmation from Facebook about the same.

The court had, in the last hearing, approved Internet Freedom Foundation’s (IFF) plea to act as an intervener in the ongoing case, that is now examining ways in which cybercrime might be curbed with the assistance of social media companies. The hearing had lasted for more than an hour and saw representation from the government of Tamil Nadu, TRAI, Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, and Google.

This case had originally been filed in 2018 as a PIL by Antony Clement Rubin (writ petition no. 20774/2018) and Janani Krishnamurthy (W.P. No. 20214/2018) that sought a writ mandamus (special order by court) to “declare the linking of Aadhaar or any one of the Government authorized identity proof as mandatory for the purpose of authentication while obtaining any email or user account”.

Here are the other key takeaways from the daily order:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
  • Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) is made an intervener in W.P. No. 20774/2018, and is permitted “to implead and assist” the court as a respondent in both the cases.
  • Dr V. Kamakoti of IIT Madras will assist the Court regarding technical matters because at a meeting between social media companies and law enforcement agencies on May 22, convened at the behest of the Madras High Court, Kamakoti had suggested that WhatsApp should consider including the phone number of the originator of a message whenever a message is being forwarded, according to status report of the meeting submitted by Facebook.
  • The Court directed the Tamil Nadu government to ascertain whether the Ministry of Home Affairs had provided a specific format in which state governments were to make their crime-related requests to the intermediaries. Twitter’s counsel, Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya, had raised the issue of this format during the hearing.

Details of what happened during the last two hearings are available here and here.

Read more: Why Antony Clement Rubin petitioned Madras HC to link Aadhaar to social media accounts

[embeddoc url=”http://staging.medianama.com/wp-content/uploads/downloaded-8.pdf” download=”all”]

Written By

Send me tips at aditi@medianama.com. Email for Signal/WhatsApp.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ