wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

European Union adopts framework to impose sanctions for foreign cyberattacks

The Council of the European Union established a framework that allows the EU, for the first time, to impose “restrictive measures” – sanctions – on individuals and entities who carry out cyber attacks against it from outside the bloc. It said the aim of the new framework was to to “deter and respond to cyber-attacks that constitute an external threat to the EU or its member states.” It will also apply to cyber attacks on third states or international organisations “where restrictive measures are considered necessary to achieve the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP),” the EU stated.

It said the new rules will apply to cyber attacks that:

  • Originate or are carried out from outside the EU
  • Use infrastructure outside the EU
  • Are carried out by persons or entities established or operating outside the EU
  • Are carried out with the support of person or entities operating outside the EU

The EU said it could also impose sanctions for “attempted cyber-attacks with a potentially significant effect”.

What sanctions could the EU impose?

The EU said its “restrictive measures” included banning people from travelling to the EU, and freezing assets of individuals and entities. Additionally, they would be barred from receiving funds from EU citizens and entities.

EU leaders agreed to begin work on a new sanctions framework for the perpetrators of cyber attacks last October, per Sputnik News. This came after the Netherlands had reported an alleged attempt to hack the WiFi system of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ