wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CAIT wants to bundle cab and delivery cos into the commerce policy

The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has asked that online cab companies Ola and Uber be brought under the ecommerce policy, reports Money Control. The CAIT confirmed to MediaNama that it had raised this issue in the meeting with DPIIT.

Last week, prior to the previous deadline for comments on the draft ecommerce policy, the Department of Promotion for Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) met with industry stakeholders like Amazon, Snapdeal, MakeMyTrip, UrbanClap, Ola, Uber, Microsoft, Netflix, AIOVA, Vyapari Mandal etc who asked for a deadline extension. The deadline has now been extended to the end of this month.

Note that this will not be the CAIT’s first time asking for Ola and Uber’s regulation. In January, the association told the Financial Express that it would “challenge Ola and Uber for the kind of monopoly they have maintained in the market and are allowed to charge dynamic fair.” Then, the CAIT also wanted Grofers, Swiggy and Zomato etc to be regulated because of their cashbacks and discounts, according to the FE report.

The CAIT added that it would launch a nationwide agitation if the “government makes any change or amendment in the policy to the advantage of global e-commerce players” and seek the PM’s intervention. In fact, then, it said that a PwC report – stating that FDI restrictions in the ecommerce industry will reduce online sales by $46 billion by 2022 – was peddling the agenda of ecommerce companies since the data in the report was supplied by these companies and found in the public domain, as opposed to PwC doing its own research.

What the policy says about “ecommerce”

According to the newly released draft policy, the CAIT is not wrong in asking for Ola and Uber’s regulation under this policy, since the policy does not explicitly define ecommerce. It instead intermixes the terms “ecommerce” and the “digital ecosystem” and adds:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

e-Commerce includes buying, selling, marketing or distribution of
– goods, including digital products and
– services; through electronic network
– “Delivery of goods, including digital products, and services may be online or through traditional mode of physical delivery.
– Similarly, payments against such goods and services may be made online or through traditional banking channels i.e. cheques, demand drafts or through cash.”

Opposing views: MNCs vs local players and associations

The pushback to this policy has representations from both sides. Amazon executives said that the new regulation could have unintended consequences, inconsistent with better prices and selection for Indian users, while Walmart executives said that the company was disappointed with the change of law and lack of consultation.

Meanwhile, the Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM) asked for heavier regulation of the ecommerce industry in India. The National Restaurant Association of India also wants a code of conduct to to deal with deep discounts, the ‘dumping of capital’ and perpetually on-sale items influencing market forces by online food delivery platforms.

Read about the recent FDI in ecommerce policy as well here.

Further reading: State intervention in the development of Digital India – Sidharth Chopra, Nandita Saikia

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I'm a MediaNama alumna from 2015-16 (remember TinyOwl?) now back to cover e-services like food and grocery delivery, app based transport and policies, platforms and media in India.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ