wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

TikTok fined $5.7M by the US FTC for violating kids’ privacy

Video content app TikTok has been penalized $5.7 million by the US Federal Trades Commission for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), after complaints that it illegally collected personal information of children below 13 years without parental consent.

The complaint alleged that TikTok, then known as Musical.ly, was aware that a significant percentage of its users were younger than 13. The FTC had begun looking into TikTok when it was still Musical.ly, and said that 65 million people (or 32.5%) in the US of Musical.ly’s 200 million global downloads were in the US. COPPA requires a company to get parental consent before collecting personal information from children below 13 years of age. 

The complaint: violation of children’s privacy online

The complaint alleges that TikTok violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by failing to notify parents about Musical.ly collecting personal information from kids below 13, obtaining their consent before doing so, and deleting that personal data at the parents’ request.

  • Users have to provide personal information such as email address, phone number, username, first and last name, a short biography, and a profile picture to register for TikTok
  • User accounts were public by default; a child’s bio, username, picture, and videos posted could be seen by everyone
  • Even though the app gave an option to switch to a ‘private’ account, users’ profile pictures and bios remained public, and allowed direct messages from anybody
  • There have been public reports of adults trying to contact children via Musical.ly
  • Until October 2016, the app even allowed users to view other users within a 50-mile radius

TikTok will now verify its users’ age

The FTC ruling will impact how the app functions for children below 13 years. TikTok said that it will now require all users to verify their age. Both new and existing users aged below 13 years will be directed to a “limited, separate app” with increased privacy tools. The separate app will restrict them from sharing personal information and publishing videos.

The restricted, separate app was designed in line with FTC’s guidance for mixed-audience apps. Kids below 13 cannot share videos, comment on videos, message other users, or maintain a profile or followers.

  • TikTok will take down all videos by under-13 kids, as required by the FTC settlement.
  • An app update will notify new and existing users of the age distinction; kids will need to verify their birthday in order to be directed to the restricted app

Facebook and a similar complaint to the FTC

Child rights’ advocates and other consumer groups in the US are urging the FTC to investigate whether Facebook violated federal laws by allegedly fooling kids into spending their parents’ money on online gaming. The complaint alleges that Facebook enabled “friendly fraud” by encouraging game developers to allow kids spent their parents’ money without their consent.

  • Facebook settled an earlier lawsuit regarding this in 2016 and updated its policy to address game purchases by minors
  • Advocacy groups are arguing that it wasn’t sufficient and that the FTC must look into whether Facebook violated the FTC Act (which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts) and possibly COPPA.

Also read: Facebook paid teens to install an app that collected their data: report

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I cover health, policy issues such as intermediary liability, data governance, internet shutdowns, and more. Hit me up for tips.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ