wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Mozilla, Wikimedia and Github urge IT Min RS Prasad to abandon proposed Intermediary Liability guidelines

Mozilla, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the now Microsoft-owned GitHub have written an open letter (pdf) to RS Prasad, the Union Minister of Electronics and IT, outlining their concerns with respect to the newly proposed Intermediary Liability guidelines. These 3 organisations together have “tens of millions” of users across India.

Their letter states that while the three organisations support making the internet a safer place, the current proposal “takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the internet from an open platform for creation, collaboration, access to knowledge, and innovation to a tool of automated censorship and surveillance of its users.”

Its concerns about the proposed intermediary liability rules are:

Purging content and censorship

The letter states that proactive purging of unlawful content or liability on behalf of its users upends the balance which holds bad actors liable, and companies are liable only when they are aware of such acts.

  • New rules would place a “tremendous and in many cases fatal burden” on online intermediaries.
  • This is not sustainable for a community or a startup, while large platforms which will be able to comply will be “incentivised to over-censor and take down lawful content in order to avoid the threat of liability and litigation.”
  • This filtering will “hamper the diversity of online discourse and chill free expression.”

Surveillance on internet services

  • The new rules will “significantly expand” surveillance requirements by monitoring postings of all users as well as handover info about content “senders and receivers” to the government.
  • We need strong protection of user privacy “to foster a healthy discourse and access to knowledge on the internet.”

The definition of intermediaries

  • The broad definition of intermediaries will cause “unintended harm.” The rules apply to all intermediaries including knowledge repositories, OSes, browsers etc.
  • “Importantly, we do not believe this broad range of services are the intended targets of this regulation.”

India localisation

  • The rules put a “blunt requirement” on any service with over 5 million users in India to incorporate in the country. In the group’s opinion, this is a “major operational obligation” without justification and a timeframe for compliance.
  • “This raises fears of international companies, services, and nonprofits being forced to close themselves off to Indian users, while also deterring potential market expansion of new players into India. Less diversity of services means less choices for users, harming the vibrancy of the Indian digital ecosystem.”

Ultimately, the letter adds that while the organisations are committed to privacy, freedom of speech, access to knowledge, and open collaboration, “… these rules would push us to surveil and censor content to the point of embedding automated infrastructure for surveillance and censorship of Indian users into our networks. As currently drafted, these rules would undermine Indian users’ access to myriad sites and services, putting them at a considerable disadvantage compared to users, developers, and organizations in other countries.”

“… But we cannot support the current draft of the rules put forward by the Ministry. For the sake of the internet’s future and Indian users, we urge you to abandon these proposed rules and begin afresh with public consultations on the appropriate way to counter harmful speech online,” the letter concludes.

Also read: Mozilla calls proposed IT rule changes for intermediaries ‘blunt and disproportionate’

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Our intermediary liability coverage.

Written By

I'm a MediaNama alumna from 2015-16 (remember TinyOwl?) now back to cover e-services like food and grocery delivery, app based transport and policies, platforms and media in India.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ