wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

MIB: Social media isn’t our department. Also MIB: We’ll monitor it

When Rajyavardhan Rathore became the Minister for Information & Broadcasting, he mostly evaded the topic of social media. “Social media is totally independent,” he said. “And in any case, social media doesn’t even come under this ministry.”

But just over two weeks ago, the ministry posted a tender saying that it was going to set up a social media communications hub. So far, so good. But then, the tender, which was first reported by Scroll.in, went on to say that the bidder must be able to monitor Twitter, Instagram, some blogs, and YouTube. It also said that the tool that is created for this purpose must keep track of key influencers and be able to archive and retrieve older conversations. And to top it all off, it will have to create a ‘360-degree’ view of everyone it tracks and create ‘personalized responses’.

And it will have to do all this for a cool ₹47 crore.

IFF notice

Right down to natural language processing and ‘sentiment analysis’, the tender has all the makings of an intent to surveil. Days after news of the tender broke on Scroll, the Internet Freedom Foundation* sent the ministry a legal notice demanding that the tender be withdrawn. “Putting the entire online population of internet users in India who invariably will use the social media [sic] platforms and email for communication,” the notice warned, “will have a tremendous chilling effect on their fundamental right to free speech and expression.”

The notice warned that IFF would resort to “seek remedies in accordance with the law” if the ministry didn’t cancel the tender.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The tender

Here are a few features of what the MIB wants from bidders, as described in the 66-page tender:

— The hub needs to create a “analyze as well as visualize large volumes of data across diverse digital platforms in real time”.
— It needs to “listen” and respond to online trends on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, blogs, complaint websites, and email.
— On top of Indian languages, it needs to support Chinese, German, French and Arabic content.
— It should provide a visualization of location-based trends.
— Influencer insights should be readily available, and archives of conversations should be kept and be searchable
— Provide tools for identifying and managing crises in real time
Crawl social media and the internet at large for ‘data mining’
— Create analytic reports and generate predictive analyses

The document then goes on to describe, in lengthy detail, the specifications for achieving the above goals.

Our take

It is not uncommon for private companies to keep an eye on the internet. Watching emerging trends and public conversations can be very useful for making business decisions. But that’s exactly why the same cannot apply to governments. The interests of governments are radically different when it comes to monitoring the internet. Private companies usually have little to gain by profiling individual users and everything they say online, especially at scale.

When a government implements such monitoring, especially in the scale that the I&B Ministry’s tender describes, what follows is fertile grounds for mass surveillance. It might seem comforting to assume that this tender buzzwords-ed itself until it stumbled into mass surveillance. But the detail with which it has described its requirements of keeping a track of both social media, email, and generally the whole internet and its users in India, means just one thing. And that is that mass surveillance is both the natural consequence and possibly the end-goal.

* The author of this article interned and volunteered for the Internet Freedom Foundation in the past. Nikhil Pahwa, MediaNama’s editor, is a founding member and chairman of IFF.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ