wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Bombay HC: CCTV in private property without residents’ consent illegal

The Bombay High Court ruled that installing CCTV cameras outside an apartment without consent from the flat’s resident is illegal, Live Law reports. The judge, Justice SJ Kathawalla, agreed with the plaintiffs’ argument that their privacy was being violated. “In my view, since admittedly Plaintiffs 2 to 5 are residing in [flats in a floor where the defendant does not live], no one has a right to invade their privacy,” Kathawalla said in the order. While the order does not specifically mention the recent Supreme Court judgement on the right to privacy being fundamental, this is a key case where that right has been affirmed in the months after that judgement was issued.

ReadWhat to expect from the Srikrishna Data Protection Bill (ET reports that the committee’s report is due by the end of this month, contradicting reports last week that it would be out on Monday)

Case background

In this case, a co-owner of a Colaba apartment building installed CCTV cameras on a higher floor where another owner and tenants stayed. The co-owner alleged that the residents were violating a small claims court’s judgement by sub-letting their flats to others. The plaintiffs were also cut off from accessing the terrace, where the building’s lift control room and water tankers were situated. So they sued to get the CCTV cameras removed, and the High Court’s judgement has allowed them to do that.

CCTV on private property

In the UK, there are stiff penalties and legal liabilities associated with installing CCTV cameras on private property that include footage from elsewhere. There are protections in place to protect people from CCTV surveillance when those cameras are owned and operated privately. Australia has similar protections against incidental privacy breaches by private citizens operating CCTV cameras.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ