wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Instagram, Snapchat disable Giphy feature due to racist content

Snapchat and Instagram have temporarily disabled their GIF sticker features, which were powered by Giphy, after racist content was discovered on the social media platforms. Giphy is an online database and search engine that allows users to search and share small animations files.

A racially charged GIF was found by a user who took to Twitter to express her objection. Facebook’s subsidiary Instagram has said that such content has no space on their platform while Snapchat said such GIFs are supposed to be rated PG. Community guidelines of both warn users against hate speech towards any person or group in some form.

The competing social media platforms had integrated Giphy to their platform this year: Instagram in late January and Snapchat in February. The integration has been suspended till the “problem is fixed”. Hate speech is also against Giphy’s rules.

A Giphy spokesperson told Engadget, “After investigation of the incident, this sticker was available due to a bug in our content moderation filters specifically affecting GIF stickers. We have fixed the bug and have re-moderated all of the GIF stickers in our library. Our staff is also further reviewing every GIF sticker by hand and should be finished shortly.”

Sharable Gifs are available on Facebook Messenger as well as WhatsApp, but no comments have been made about content on their platforms.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Snapchat has run into trouble for alleged racism content earlier, as it added a stereotypical “Asian face” filter in 2016.

Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



Looking at the definition of health data, it is difficult to verify whether health IDs are covered by the Bill.


The accession to the Convention brings many advantages, but it could complicate the Brazilian stance at the BRICS and UN levels.


In light of the state's emerging digital healthcare apparatus, how does Clause 12 alter the consent and purpose limitation model?


The collective implication of leaving out ‘proportionality’ from Clause 12 is to provide very wide discretionary powers to the state.


The latest draft is also problematic for companies or service providers that have nothing to with children's data.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ